Toto Wolff has admitted the upgraded ground Mercedes used on the Dutch Grand Prix might have been liable for the workforce’s drop off in efficiency.
Mercedes claimed victories at three of the final 4 races earlier than the summer season break however weren not aggressive in Zandvoort, with George Russell ending in seventh a spot forward of team-mate Lewis Hamilton as McLaren’s Lando Norris claimed a dominant win.
The Silver Arrows had been this weekend utilizing the brand new ground for the second time, having deserted it after Friday follow on the earlier spherical in Spa. With out the half, Mercedes took the chequered flag in a one-two, earlier than Russell had his victory taken away as a result of his automotive being underneath authorized weight.
With Mercedes having just some days to arrange for subsequent weekend’s Italian Grand Prix, workforce principal Wolff mentioned: “I think these cars are sometimes a surprise-box. We’ve had six [races with] podiums in a row and that doesn’t look like the car three weeks ago that was first and second, at least first on merit.
“You may’t actually find yourself with a consequence like this with none main issue taking part in, and that is one thing we have to analyse within the subsequent few days till Monza.
“Was it as a result of we put one thing on the automotive that did not assist? Did we engineer one thing into the automotive that wasn’t good?
“Then how do you justify these swings of performance? Sometimes we looked really good this weekend and then obviously today, in terms of degradation, that was not very impressive.”
Mercedes’ job – together with the remainder of the sector – was made more difficult by a lot of the weekend’s three follow classes being misplaced to dangerous climate.
Wolff defined that the restricted operating had made it exhausting for Mercedes to evaluate the information from Friday after they ran their two vehicles with completely different flooring.
He mentioned: “We back-to-backed the update kit on Friday, which was at the end left us with not a lot of data – the update kit that we put onto the car in Spa on Friday and then took off again.
“After which clearly with the dearth of operating, like all people else, perhaps it did not determine the correct issues for the automotive. So, there might be a couple of components in play that contributed to this non-performance.”
Asked if he thought the issue was specifically the floor, Wolff added: “I do not need to soar to conclusions too rapidly as a result of we will take a look at it the approaching days and hopefully looking for clues within the knowledge.
“Was it a setup? Was it the track? What is it that we got wrong? Was it the floor that we put on the car? Was it all of this together?
“So, hopefully we are able to kind it out till Monza and grow to be aggressive once more. However the swing in efficiency from P1-P2 and P7-P8, there is a biggie in there. It is not one thing that was merely a setup choice in my view.”
Russell: We positively bought one thing improper
Russell began from fourth after an honest qualifying effort however lacked tempo within the race, dropping backwards having run third for a lot of the opening stint after passing Oscar Piastri firstly.
A sluggish pit cease noticed Russell lose a spot to Charles Leclerc, however his tempo afterwards was poor and he was handed by Piastri, earlier than an additional cease as a result of excessive tyre degradation noticed him lose additional locations to Carlos Sainz and Sergio Perez.
“I don’t really understand what has happened, in all honesty,” Russell instructed Sky Sports activities F1. “We were slow on all three tyres and went backwards.
“It was bizarre how we certified fourth and had been constantly simply behind the three vehicles in entrance and in entrance of the Ferrari and all of it disappeared.
“It just felt like it had no grip, sliding around like I was on ice. Something to do with the tyres. We definitely got something wrong somewhere, but I am scratching my head.
“That is positively an outlier. We’ve been there the final six races. Efficiency does swing circuit to circuit, however this does appear odd. It is unusual we’ve got received three of the final 4 then end 50 seconds behind the win right now.”
Hamilton: I may have gotten podium from Russell’s place
It was at all times more likely to be a protracted afternoon for Hamilton, who began from 14th on the grid after a shock Q2 exit was compounded by a three-place grid penalty for impeding.
The seven-time world champion was really happy with race tempo as he battled forwards, and advised he may have competed for a podium had he began in his team-mate’s grid slot of fourth.
“I was much happier today,” Hamilton instructed Sky Sports activities F1. “I used to be transferring forwards, progressing, transferring in the correct path, simply too far again sadly.
“Even though I had a lot of understeer in P1, the car felt great and even for P2. Then we made this change overnight because we had so much understeer and it flipped it. We backed out a bunch of wing for the race and I was progressing.
“If I certified the place George was, then I believe I might have completed a minimum of there, if not additional forward.
“I think we could have been close to a podium. I don’t know if we were faster than Ferrari but there were elements of our pace that was strong.
“The automotive was not nice in comparison with the final race, after we had much more tempo. We had been nearer to others right now.”
The 2024 Formula 1 season continues with the Italian Grand Prix at Monza next weekend, live on Sky Sports F1. Stream each F1 race and extra with a NOW Sports activities Month Membership – No contract, cancel anytime