Packages transfer alongside a conveyor belt at an Amazon Success heart on Cyber Monday in Robbinsville, New Jersey, on Nov. 28, 2022.
Stephanie Keith | Bloomberg | Getty Photos
Jamaal Sanford acquired a disturbing electronic mail in Could of final 12 months. The message, whose sender claimed to be a part of a “Russian shadow team,” contained Sanford’s residence handle, social safety quantity and his daughter’s faculty. It got here with a really particular menace.
The sender mentioned Sanford, who lives in Springfield, Missouri, would solely solely be protected if he eliminated a destructive on-line overview.
“Do not play tough guy,” the e-mail mentioned. “You have nothing to gain by keeping the reviews and EVERYTHING to lose by not cooperating.”
Months earlier, Sanford had left a scathing overview for an e-commerce “automation” firm known as Ascend Ecom on the score web site Trustpilot. Ascend’s purported enterprise was the launching and managing of Amazon storefronts on behalf of purchasers, who would pay cash for the service and the promise of incomes hundreds of {dollars} in “passive income.”
Sanford had invested $35,000 in such a scheme. He by no means recouped the cash and is now in debt, in accordance with a Federal Commerce Fee lawsuit unsealed on Friday.
His expertise is a key piece of the FTC’s go well with, which accuses Ascend of breaking federal legal guidelines by making false claims associated to earnings and enterprise efficiency, and threatening or penalizing clients for posting trustworthy evaluations, amongst different violations. The FTC is looking for financial aid for Ascend clients and to stop Ascend from doing enterprise completely.
It is the most recent signal of the FTC’s crackdown on e-commerce money-making schemes on prime of a few of the web’s main marketplaces, like Amazon and Airbnb. Since mid-2023, the company has sued no less than 4 automation corporations, alleging misleading advertising and marketing practices and falsely telling clients that they might generate passive revenue.
The FTC is not simply targeted on e-commerce automation companies. On Wednesday, the company mentioned it is stepping up enforcement towards corporations that use synthetic intelligence “as a way to supercharge deceptive or unfair conduct that harms consumers.” The company pointed to Ascend as an organization that it took motion towards partially due to its claims that it used AI “to maximize clients’ business success.”
The FTC has additionally pledged to go after corporations that attempt to suppress destructive evaluations on-line as a part of new guidelines issued this 12 months focusing on faux evaluations.
Automation companies like Ascend promote their simple cash alternatives on Instagram, TikTok and YouTube. However their guarantees go principally unfulfilled, and sometimes the storefronts get shut down for violating insurance policies round dropshipping — the promoting of merchandise to clients with out ever stocking stock — or counterfeits.
The FTC’s grievance towards Ascend accused co-founders Will Basta and Jeremy Leung of defrauding shoppers of no less than $25 million by means of their scheme. Shaped in 2021, Ascend has achieved enterprise beneath a number of entity names with operations registered in states together with Texas, Wyoming and California.
Lina Khan, Chair of the Federal Commerce Fee (FTC), testifies earlier than the Home Appropriations Subcommittee on the Rayburn Home Workplace Constructing on Could 15, 2024 in Washington, DC.
Kevin Dietsch | Getty Photos Information | Getty Photos
The submitting reveals that the threats towards Sanford grew extra menacing. Two days after the preliminary electronic mail, Sanford’s spouse’s telephone lit up with a textual content message containing a picture of a severed head that once more urged the removing of the unflattering overview.
“Your husband has angered some people with his ignorance,” the textual content message mentioned. “The type he does not wish to anger.”
Sanford quickly bought a safety system for his residence.
Sanford mentioned in an interview that Ascend had promised his Amazon storefront would generate sufficient income to cowl the price of stock the corporate purchased every month on his behalf. Months glided by and his retailer amassed a “smorgasbord” of things, from LED lights to nutritional vitamins, which Ascend bought from different retailers like Macy’s and House Depot after which offered on Amazon, Sanford mentioned. The corporate used the dropshipping mannequin, Sanford mentioned, which frequently led to the shops getting suspended on Amazon.
Amazon prohibits retailers from dropshipping except they determine themselves as the vendor of report, which means their title is listed on the bill, packing slip and different supplies.
‘Depleted financial institution accounts’
As Sanford’s gross sales sputtered and his money owed swelled, he made a collection of complaints to Basta and Leung. Once they went unanswered, he left the destructive evaluations. Sanford mentioned Ascend ultimately provided to refund him $20,000 if he would take down the overview, however he declined.
“I think I’m resigned to the fact that I won’t be getting my money back and now I just want accountability,” he mentioned.
Karl Kronenberger, a lawyer for Ascend, mentioned in a press release that the corporate denies ever threatening clients and it tried to resolve any disputes “in good faith.”
“We are investigating whether a competitor of Ascend may be the driving force behind some of the allegations in the case,” Kronenberger mentioned.
Ascend’s advertising and marketing pitch claimed clients may rapidly earn hundreds of {dollars} from gross sales generated on Amazon, Walmart and different platforms. The corporate mentioned it had developed proprietary synthetic intelligence instruments that it used to determine top-selling merchandise.
E-commerce automation corporations are more and more exploiting Amazon’s third-party market, which now hosts hundreds of thousands of retailers and accounts for greater than half of all items offered on the positioning.
Amazon did not present a remark for this story.
Ascend promoted the scheme as “risk free,” the FTC mentioned, due to its buyback assure, which successfully dedicated to make purchasers entire in the event that they did not recoup their funding inside 36 months.
“After consumers invest, the promised gains never materialize, and consumers are left with depleted bank accounts and hefty credit card bills,” the regulator wrote in its grievance.
So as to add an air of legitimacy, Ascend falsely claimed it had been featured in media retailers like Forbes, Yahoo! Finance and Enterprise Insider, the FTC mentioned. It primarily marketed its enterprise on social media platforms TikTok, X, YouTube and Instagram.
Ascend faces two lawsuits in California that allege breach of contract and different claims, in accordance with the FTC. In January, an arbitration motion was filed towards Ascend in Florida on behalf of 30 clients. Nima Tahmassebi, an lawyer representing the Ascend clients, advised CNBC that the purchasers selected to withdraw the declare as soon as they realized of the FTC case.
Tahmassebi mentioned he has been contacted by tons of of people who “all but begged for legal assistance” as a result of they misplaced cash after paying for Ascend’s automation companies.
“I’m talking to people who said I can’t get Christmas gifts this year because of my situation with them,” Tahmassebi mentioned. “People took money they could have applied to their kid’s college tuition. Now it’s gone, and they’re left bewildered.”
WATCH: How Amazon grew to become 2023’s prime attire and footwear vendor