This story has been up to date all through with extra particulars because the story has developed. We are going to proceed to take action because the case and dispute are ongoing.
The world of WordPress, probably the most fashionable applied sciences for creating and internet hosting web sites, goes by means of a really heated controversy. The core concern is the struggle between WordPress founder and Automattic CEO Matt Mullenweg and WP Engine, which hosts web sites constructed on WordPress.
WordPress know-how is open supply and free, and it powers an enormous chunk of the web — round 40% of internet sites. Web sites can host their very own WordPress occasion or use an answer supplier like Automattic or WP Engine for a plug-and-play answer.
In mid-September, Mullenweg wrote a weblog publish calling WP Engine a “cancer to WordPress.” He criticized the host for disabling the power for customers to see and observe the revision historical past for each publish. Mullenweg believes this characteristic is on the “core of the user promise of protecting your data” and stated that WP Engine turns it off by default to economize.
He additionally known as out WP Engine investor Silver Lake and stated they don’t contribute sufficiently to the open supply challenge and that WP Engine’s use of the “WP” model has confused prospects into believing it’s a part of WordPress.
The authorized battle
In reply, WP Engine despatched a cease-and-desist letter to Mullenweg and Automattic to withdraw their feedback. It additionally stated that its use of the WordPress trademark was coated beneath honest use.
The corporate claimed that Mullenweg had stated he would take a “scorched earth nuclear approach” in opposition to WP Engine until it agreed to pay “a significant percentage of its revenues for a license to the WordPress trademark.”
In response, Automattic despatched its personal cease-and-desist letter to WP Engine, saying that they’d breached WordPress and WooCommerce trademark utilization guidelines.
The WordPress Basis additionally modified its Trademark Coverage web page and known as out WP Engine, alleging the internet hosting service has confused customers.
“The abbreviation ‘WP’ is not covered by the WordPress trademarks, but please don’t use it in a way that confuses people. For example, many people think WP Engine is ‘WordPress Engine’ and officially associated with WordPress, which it’s not. They have never once even donated to the WordPress Foundation, despite making billions of revenue on top of WordPress,” the up to date web page reads.
WP Engine ban, and trademark battle
Mullenweg then banned WP Engine from accessing the assets of WordPress.org. Whereas components like plug-ins and themes are beneath open supply license, suppliers like WP Engine need to run a service to fetch them, which isn’t coated beneath the open supply license.
This broke lots of web sites and prevented them from updating plug-ins and themes. It additionally left a few of them open to safety assaults. The group was not happy with this method of leaving small web sites helpless.
In response to the incident, WP Engine stated in a publish that Mullenweg had misused his management of WordPress to intervene with WP Engine prospects’ entry to WordPress.org.
“Matt Mullenweg’s unprecedented and unwarranted action interferes with the normal operation of the entire WordPress ecosystem, impacting not just WP Engine and our customers, but all WordPress plugin developers and open source users who depend on WP Engine tools like ACF,” WP Engine stated.
On September 27, WordPress.org lifted the ban briefly, permitting WP Engine to entry assets till October 1.
Mullenweg wrote a weblog publish clarifying that the struggle is just in opposition to WP Engine over emblems. He stated Automattic has been making an attempt to dealer a trademark licensing deal for a very long time, however WP Engine’s solely response has been to “string us along.”
On September 30, a day earlier than the WordPress.org deadline for the ban on WP Engine, the internet hosting firm up to date its web site’s footer to make clear it’s not straight affiliated with the WordPress Basis or owns the WordPress commerce.
“WP Engine is a proud member and supporter of the community of WordPress® users. The WordPress® trademark is the intellectual property of the WordPress Foundation, and the Woo® and WooCommerce® trademarks are the intellectual property of WooCommerce, Inc. Uses of the WordPress®, Woo®, and WooCommerce® names in this website are for identification purposes only and do not imply an endorsement by WordPress Foundation or WooCommerce, Inc. WP Engine is not endorsed or owned by, or affiliated with, the WordPress Foundation or WooCommerce, Inc,” the up to date description on the location learn.
The corporate additionally modified its plan names from “Essential WordPress,” “Core WordPress,” and “Enterprise WordPress” to “Essential,” “Core,” and “Enterprise.”
WP Engine stated in an announcement that it modified these phrases to moot Automattic’s claims.
“We, like the rest of the WordPress community, use the WordPress mark to describe our business. Automattic’s suggestion that WPE needs a license to do that is simply wrong, and reflects a misunderstanding of trademark law. To moot its claimed concerns, we have eliminated the few examples Automattic gave in its September 23rd letter to us,” an organization spokesperson informed TechCrunch.
On October 1, the corporate posted on X that it has efficiently deployed its personal answer for updating plug-ins and themes.
The WordPress group and different initiatives really feel this might additionally occur to them and wish clarification from Automattic, which has an unique license to the WordPress trademark. The group can be asking about clear steerage round how they will and may’t use “WordPress.”
The WordPress Basis, which owns the trademark, has additionally filed to trademark “Managed WordPress” and “Hosted WordPress.” Builders and suppliers are fearful that if these emblems are granted, they might be used in opposition to them.
Builders have expressed considerations over counting on business open supply merchandise associated to WordPress, particularly when their entry can go away shortly.
Open-source content material administration system Ghost’s founder John O’Nolan additionally weighed in on the difficulty and criticized management of WordPress being with one particular person.
“The web needs more independent organizations, and it needs more diversity. 40% of the web and 80% of the CMS market should not be controlled by any one individual,” he stated in an X publish.
On October 9, net app growth framework Ruby on rails creator David Heinemeier Hansson opined that Automattic is violating principals of open supply software program by asking WP Engine to pay 8% of its revenues.
“Automattic is completely out of line, and the potential damage to the open source world extends far beyond the WordPress. Don’t let the drama or its characters distract you from that threat,” he stated in a weblog publish.
On the identical day, Mullenweg added a brand new checkbox to WordPress.org contributor login, asking folks to confirm that they aren’t related to WP Engine in any means. This transfer was criticized by the contributor group. Some contributors stated that they had been banned from the group Slack for opposing the transfer.
In response, WP Engine stated that its prospects, businesses, customers, and the group as an entire usually are not the corporate’s associates.
WP Engine lawsuit and Automattic exodus
On October 3, WP Engine sued Automattic and Mullenweg over abuse of energy in a court docket in California. The internet hosting firm additionally alleged that Automattic and Mullenweg didn’t preserve their guarantees to run WordPress open-source initiatives with none constraints and giving builders the liberty to construct, run, modify and redistribute the software program.
“Matt Mullenweg’s conduct over the last ten days has exposed significant conflicts of interest and governance issues that, if left unchecked, threaten to destroy that trust. WP Engine has no choice but to pursue these claims to protect its people, agency partners, customers, and the broader WordPress community,” the corporate stated in an announcement to TechCrunch.
The lawsuit additionally notes alleged texts from Mullenweg about probably hiring WP Engine CEO Heather Brunner. In a touch upon Hacker Information, Mullenweg stated that Brunner wished to be an govt director of WordPress.org.
In response, Automattic known as this case meritless.
“I stayed up last night reading WP Engine’s Complaint, trying to find any merit anywhere to it. The whole thing is meritless, and we look forward to the federal court’s consideration of their lawsuit,” the corporate’s authorized consultant, Neal Katyal, stated in a weblog publish.
On the identical day, 159 Automattic staff who didn’t agree with Mullenweg’s course of the corporate and WordPress general took a severance bundle and left the corporate. Nearly 80% of people that left labored in Automattic’s Ecosystem / WordPress division.
On October 8, WordPress stated that Mary Hubbard, who was TikTok US’s head of governance and expertise, might be beginning as govt director. This publish was beforehand held by Josepha Haden Chomphosy, who was one of many 159 folks leaving Automattic. A day previous to this, one of many engineers from WP Engine introduced that he was becoming a member of Automattic.
You possibly can contact this reporter at im@ivanmehta.com or on Sign: @ivan.42
